Saturday, February 12, 2005

*Inside Deep Throat


Directed by Fenton Bailey and Randy Barbato

It's hard to talk about a movie like this. Whenever people start talking about movies like this, they wind up talking more about the actual events or engage in the debate itself, rather than talking about the film as a film. So, I'm going to try not to talk about politics, sexual or otherwise, or life in the age of "porno" vs. the age of "porn", or how much I miss top-loaders (I do! Top-loaders are the shit! Do the kids still say that? "The shit"?) - most importantly, I will do my best to separate discussion of the movie Deep Throat (which I've never seen - I'm sure I would have remembered if I had, I remember all the other awful '70s porn videos I saw when I was a kid) from that of the movie I just saw tonight, Inside Deep Throat. DT and IDT, for short.

So, first off, did I like IDT? Yeah, it was alright. I was a bit worried at first that the makers seemed overly coy about DT's subject matter, that they were dancing around it, always referring to it as "the act", or "that thing that she could do". It reminded me of an professor I had in undergrad, poor thing, who was trying to teach us the (non-)subtleties of Restoration-era English comedies, but seemed incapable of even alluding to anything at all untoward without blushing, giggling, covering her mouth, let alone actually being able to say aloud the word S-E-X.

And then, they show it. They show it. And it's masterful. Not only what Linda Lovelace does, but the way it is revealed in the film. Finally, I think, a movie!

Oh, and before I'm accused of being overly coy and all blushy and giggly myself, allow me to be completely clear what "it" is. "It" is Linda Lovelace taking a huge, erect penis all the way down her throat.

The history and aftermath of this one wonderful (possibly even important) moment in pop culture, and to a lesser extent, pornography itself, is traced through some cool archival footage and excellent interviews with everyone involved in its making, including its distributors, prosecutors and defenders, a handful of some of the best-selling authors and thinkers on the subject, Dr. Ruth Westheimer (I swear, didn't she die?), and of course the filmmakers themsleves, including director Gerard Damiano (he of the worst hairpiece in history), a crazy-eyed Harry Reems (who I can't remember if he actually did fake his own death, or was just rumored to have died), even Linda Lovelace herself (who, sadly, did pass away in April 2002). Stories from Lovelace's family and a childhood friend add weight and gravity, if not any concrete answers, to what pretty much amounts to a very, very sad life.

There are some things I could have done without. I could have done without the cutesy introductions of the protagonists of this little tale, and the Big Ending tries to give both this film and its subject far greater cultural weight than either have, on the terms of IDT, I think, earned. I mean, I could buy that the emergence and popularity of pornography in the early '70s was, in its way, the birth (or, at the very least, a birth) of today's independent film, and this one stupid little movie (DT) really did open up discussion and debate not only on censorship and morality, but on the idea of the clitoral orgasm and, by extension, the very concept of female sexuality itself, not to mention making a ton of money for...well, the mob, I guess, seeing as how everyone interviewed claims not to have seen dime one of the literally hundreds of millions of dollars DT has made, and though IDT's assertion that the porn industry is killing itself with oversaturation is true, the film goes on to posit that this oversaturation is removing all trace of art that ever existed in porn. This, not thirty minutes after talking about, and showing, Harry Reems giving the worst acting performance ever committed to film. Honestly, how much "art" was there ever involved?

Also, with all the interviews, why the distracting, heavy-handed narration (Dennis Hopper, no less)? One or two additional interviews would have taken care of it. It is, after all, the great interviews that make this movie. If you're are looking for a human face to put to the triumphs, tragedies, and reluctant legacy of this one, single, stupid movie from long long ago, don't ask the starlets at the AVN Awards, who have hardly even heard of DT, let alone seen it. No, you need look no further than the wife of former Miami theater owner Arthur Sommer. Classic.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home